| Nature
and Definition of Crime and Deviance |
| Formal
and Informal Rules |
|
|
(norm or
rule-breaking behaviour)Crime (specific form of
deviance. Breaking of legal (state) norms / rules)
Note: Not all deviance is
criminal, just as some forms of crime (e.g. illegal parking) not seen as
particularly deviant.
Formal rules: laws (state
rules), written rules /regulations (e.g. School rules)Informal rules: unstated /
unwritten rules / norms (e.g. Picking your nose)
- Social Construction of deviance
:
Is deviance an absolute or relative concept?
- Historical differences
(e.g. abortion, homosexuality, drug use)
- Cross-Cultural differences
(e.g. alcohol use, dress codes)
- Different societies and same
society at different times develop different interpretations of deviant /
non-deviant behaviour. If same behaviour can be shown to be interpreted
differently, suggests deviance is a relative concept (that is, relative
to the culture or subculture in which behaviour is interpreted).
- Societal
and Situational
deviance (Plummer): Behaviour considered deviant (illegal?) by society
may be acceptable to subcultural groups (e.g. Bank robbery / homosexuality) and
vice versa (abortion is legal in UK but unacceptable to some religious
subcultures).
- Hagan
("The
Disreputable Pleasures"): Conflict and Consensus crimes:
Seriousness of deviance related to:
Level of social agreement
(High = serious / Low = non-serious)
Level of social reaction (strong
= serious / weak = non-serious)
Assessment of personal /
social harm / injury (High = serious)
|
| Social
Construction of Deviance |
|
- Interactionism
/ Labelling
theory: "Deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label" (Becker):
i.e. what is deviant to you is normal to me.
- Primary deviance
:
Norm-breaking that hasn't been publicly-labelled as deviant
- Secondary deviance: What
happens after someone (e.g. Control Agency such as police) reacts to the fact of
your deviance (the consequences of the social reaction to deviant behaviour)
- Social reaction
: Seen by
Interactionists (and Radical Criminologists) as a crucial variable in the
understanding of deviance. If no-one reacts to your deviant behaviour,
the social consequences are minimal…- Stigma
: One possible
consequence of being labelled deviant (social disapproval)
- Non-culpable deviance
:
Deviant behaviour for which individual is not held responsible (e.g. madness,
disability, some forms of children's behaviour)
- Culpable deviance:
Deviance for which individual is seen to have responsibility.
- Different basic forms of
deviance (Good / Admired behaviour. Bad behaviour. Odd behaviour)
- Folk devils
(S.Cohen) - how
and why some groups / individuals are scapegoated / stigmatised (symbolic
embodiment of social fears). E.g. Youth subcultures- Moral Panics
(see: Deviancy
Amplification): Role of media (and moral entrepreneurs) in
creation of social concern about deviance.
|
| The
Measurement, Extent and Distribution of Crime / Deviance |
| Measurement
(note: Reliability and Validity) |
|
- Official Crime Statistics
(reliable)
- Underestimation of crime
(especially middle class / female)
- Overestimation of crime
(especially working class / male)
- Reported to and recorded by
police
- Self Report Surveys
(valid)
- e.g. Campbell "Delinquent Girls", British Crime Surveys (bi-annual)
- Underestimation of some crime
(domestic / sexual crime)
- Victim Surveys
(valid):
British Crime Surveys / Islington Crime Survey.
- Crime recording
depends on: status
of complainant, differential law enforcement polices, police and public perceptions
/ socialisation, moral panics.- Crime reporting
depends on:
Nature of offence (serious / trivial), embarrassment, fear
of reprisal, no faith in police, unaware of victimisation.
- Dark figure of crime
(difference between actual number of crimes and crimes reported to police): Some
crime always reported (e.g. car theft) / Many crimes not reported (e.g. Theft,
burglary, fraud)
- Interactionism - Official crime
statistics reflect police / public perceptions
- Radical Criminology
("idealist"): Statistics represent official concerns.
- New Left Realism
("realist") - Statistics broadly reflect crime distribution.
|
Patterns
of crime
(Official Crime Statistics) |
|
- Social Class - most crime
committed by working class
- Gender
- males generally more criminal than
females- Age
- young (under 21) commit more crimes than
adults (over 21)- Ethnicity
- young, working class, blacks commit
more crimes (note concepts of age and class here).- Region
- less crime in rural areas than in urban
areas (inner cities, council housing estates especially). Different types of
crime by region.
- Overall
: Most criminal in our society are young,
working class, males.
- Explanations
: Consider the following concepts:
- Socialisation / Social Control
(agencies such as
family, police). Self controls (middle classes - more to lose, better life
chances). Informal controls more effective in rural areas (Tonnies: Gemeinschaft
/ Gesellshaft)- Visibility
of crimes (opportunistic,
witnesses, identifiable victims)- Policing strategies
(some groups, regions, crimes,
policed heavily)- Lifestyles
(e.g. Youth = socially active (clubs,
pubs, etc.). Relationship between age and crime may have more to do with youth
lifestyles than "age".
- Opportunity structures
(e.g. men and women, young
and old, etc. have different chances for committing crimes. Where opportunities
similar (e.g. shoplifting, similar levels of crime for above groups). Middle
class males commit different types of crime (fraud etc) than working class
females.
|
| The
Impact of Crime (1): Victimisation |
|
- Objective dimension
(financial cost, personal effect - "nuisance value")
- Subjective
dimension (psychological impact -
trauma, fear. stress)
- British Crime Surveys:
- Most victims suffer little effect.
- Most serious effects = personal crimes (wounding,
robbery, burglary etc. - the effect of "invasion of privacy")
- Most serious crime for men = mugging.
- Most serious crime for women = domestic violence.
- Indirect effects of victimisation:
- On family / relatives (e.g. murder)
- Witnessing crimes (shock, fear)
- Quality of life (effects of prostitution, drug abuse,
racial harassment)
- Fraud, shoplifting - indirect economic costs to
general public
- Racism
- Environmental crimes (pollution etc.)
- Repeat victimisation
- most likely = burglary,
sexual abuse, domestic violence, racial harassment / violence.
|
The
Impact of Crime (2):
The Fear of Crime. |
|
- National Surveys
: e.g. .British Crime Survey (BCS)
- since 1982 - Bi-annual.- Local Surveys
: e.g. Islington Crime Survey (Lea
and Young)- Victim Surveys:
Most worried = Inner City dwellers (Mawby and Walklate
'94); the Elderly (statistically least at risk)
Least worried = young males (most at risk of personal
assault)
33% feared burglary (Burglary = 6% of all crime)
15% feared mugging (Mugging = 1% of all crime)
Crime most feared by all = burglary
Women most fearful of crime (especially rape)
- Islington crime Survey
(New Left Realism): fear
realistically related to high crime areas
- Social Class
: Poor fear crime the most (Kinsey and
Anderson '92)
- Impact of crime greater on poor, elderly because of
their status:
Poor = uninsured
Elderly = fear of violence
- Zedner '97: Fear is related to general social concerns
(moral decline, insecurity, etc.)
- Are fears justified / irrational? Or is
"fear" precautionary?
- Fear related to Risk Avoidance (especially
women, elderly): May explain why, statistically, such groups experience
"less victimisation".
- Is "fear" right way to view this situation?
Lack of reliable and valid empirical data about
"fear of crime" and relationship between risk avoidance and
victimisation
Risk avoidance behaviour is related to many things (e.g. lack of money,
lack of mobility), not just "fear"
People respond to crime in many different ways (shock, anger, etc.), not
just in terms of "fear"
|
| Theories
of Crime and Deviance (1) |
| Positivist
/ Functionalist |
|
Searching for the causes of
crime:
Individual (biological, chemical,
genetic, social)
Society (factors that create criminal tendencies within
different individuals)
- Structural Functionalism:
- Durkheim:
The functions of crime.
Boundary marking for acceptable / unacceptable
behaviour (laws)
Public marking of boundaries (judicial process, media)
Social solidarity / social integration
Too much crime = dysfunctional = social disorganisation
(anomie)
- Merton
(Strain Theory): Explanation for
economic crimes
- Socialisation (into society's values:
"success" (the "American dream")
- Responses to disjunction between "ends" and
"means" (anomie):
Conformity, Innovation, Ritualism, Retreatism,
Rebellion.
- Ecological
(Area Studies): Chicago School (1920's
/ '30's): Social Disorganisation- Social Darwinism
(Park)- Concentric Zone Theory
(Shaw and McKay)- Cultural Transmission Theory
- Differential Association
(Sutherland and Cressey):
cf. White-collar crime
- UK Areas studies:
Mays (Liverpool 1950's)
Morris (Croydon 1957)
Rex and Moore (Birmingham 1967): "Housing
classes"
|
Subcultural:
See also Education: Pupil Subcultures |
|
- Reactive
(or "oppositional")
- A.Cohen - Status Frustration)
- P.Willis: Learning to Labour
- D.Hargreaves: Social Relations in a Secondary School
- Independent
:
- W.Miller (Focal concerns of working class youth)
- Anomie and Subcultures:
- P.Woods (anomie and pupil subcultures)
- Legitimate and Illegitimate Opportunity Structures
- (Cloward and Ohlin: Criminal,
Conflict and Retreatist subcultures).
Delinquency and Drift (Matza):
"Guilt" and Techniques of neutralisation.
- Feminism
(be aware of varieties / differences)
- Patriarchy
- Women as oppressed group / sex class
- Legal and status equality
See: Social Distribution of Crime
|
| Interactionist |
|
- Interactionist (Social
Constructionism): How is reality socially constructed?
- Deviance is not a quality of behaviour. Rather it is a
quality of how people react to that behaviour (Becker). Deviance = relative
concept.
- Anti-positivist
(there can be no universal causes
of crime)- Labelling Theories
: (Becker, S.Cohen, Lemert)
- Mead: Self development: The "I" and the
"Me"
- Cooley: The "Looking Glass" Self.
- Power
- Ideology
(Becker)
Deviants as "victims of a labelling
process"Primary and Secondary deviation (Lemert)Deviancy Amplification System (Wilkins)
- Examples: Cohen (Folk Devils and Moral Panics); Young
(Cannabis users); S.Hall (Mugging)
Folk devils
Moral panics
Moral entrepreneurs (individuals / interest groups
- media)Deviant careerLabels: stickiness, rejection of, negotiation and
re-negotiation.
|
| Critical
Theories |
|
- Traditional / Instrumental Marxism:
- Criminals as underclass ("social
scum": appropriators of surplus value)
- Law: reflects interests of ruling class:
- Economic contracts / regulations
- Social Order
- Power
(how laws are created and selectively
applied)- Ideology
: how ideas about law. Order, crime etc.
are manipulated.- Class
struggle
- Neo-Marxism: Subcultural:
e.g. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies:
- Resistance
(symbolic): Hall and Jefferson. P.Cohen
(Mods)- Hegemony
(bourgeois)- Style
(and its meaning)
- Ethnic
and gender subcultures in addition
to class and youth (e.g. McRobbie and Garber)
- Neo-Marxism: Radical
Criminology ("Left Idealism"): Early 1970's
- Taylor, Walton and Young (UK), Hall (UK), Quinney
(USA)
- Deviants as
"romantics" / "outlaws" (challenge bourgeois hegemony)
- Fully Social Theory of
Deviance involves understanding of:
- Cultural and Subcultural factors, the deviants'
meanings, social reaction, deviant's reaction to this, outcome of the
"reaction to the social reaction".
Corporate and environmental
crime (white collar criminality). E.g. Chambliss
Relative autonomy of State
Hegemonic role of ruling class
Social class / class struggle
- Neo-Marxism: New Left Realism (1980 / '90's)
- Lea and Young ("What Is To be Done About Law and
Order")
- Critical of "Left idealism" / "Left
Functionalism" (e.g. Radical criminology)
- Official Crime Statistics broadly reliable and valid
- 3 major concepts:
- Relative deprivation
Subculture
marginalization (political,
economic, ideological)
- Local crime surveys (e.g.
Islington)
|
| New
Right Realism |
|
- New Right Realism (a
"realistic" approach to crime control)
- Control Theory
(e.g. Reckless (1956), - related to
Functionalist theories of crime (Community, Social Solidarity, Integration,
etc.)
- Hirschi (1969): Strength of social
bonds:
- Attachment, Commitment, Involvement and Shared Beliefs
- 1980's / 1990's: Radical Right /
neo-conservatism
- Wilson ("Thinking About Crime"): Positivist
methodology: Focus on:
- Creating conformity to moral values (informal social
controls)
- Visible, street, crime
- Increasing chances of criminal being caught (more
police, etc.)
- Cost / Benefit analysis (rational
assessments by criminals)
- Libertarianism
- self-policing of white-collar,
"victimless", crimes, etc.- Decriminalisation
of non-violent crimes
- Van Den Haag ("Punishing Criminals", 1975):
Poor most likely to break law, therefore, should be policed more closely.
Objective = deterrence.
- Situational Theories
: e.g. Gough and Mayhew. (cf.
Ecological theory)
- Develop ways of making crime "more
difficult": Make people:
- More aware of opportunistic crime (e.g.
advertising campaigns)
- Aware of how physical environment encourages / deters
crime
|
| Social
Control |
| Formal
and Informal |
|
- Social control involves:
- Self-control
- Individual sanction
- Agencies of control:
Formal (e.g. police and courts), Informal (e.g. Family)
- Key concepts:
- Power: to create and
enforce ideas about normality / deviance
- Authority: aspect of
power relating to legitimacy
- Ideology: ideas about
deviance / non-deviance
- Informal controls - types of
positive and negative sanctions
- Formal
controls (laws,
written rules) - types of positive and negative sanctions
- Involves standardised responses
to clearly-defined norms
- S.Cohen:
Changing nature of formal controls:
- Increased differentiation and
classification of criminals
- Increasing segregation of
criminals (physical / psychiatric)
- Punishment shifts (away from
physical torture / degradation)
- Increased State involvement
(rationalisation / bureaucratisation)
|
| Agencies |
|
- Policing Styles:
- Consensual (Community style)
- Conflict (Military style - e.g.
Northern Ireland)
- Pro-active policing
:
- Experts (e.g. social workers)
Technology (e.g. video)
Community (e.g. Neighbourhood watch)
- Unequal application of laws
(police discretion / labelling theory)
- Institutional racism and sexism
- Differential arrest rates (cf.
Social distribution of crime etc.):
- Class
- Age
- Gender
- Ethnicity
- Region
- Agencies of social control
:
Revise examples relating to following:
- Family
- The State (government)
- Police and Judiciary
- Mass Media (cf. Deviancy
amplification / Moral panics)
- Medical profession / social
workers (medicalisation of deviance)
- Education system
|